Cases 1 - 10 of 1,930
Smith v. Allison et al
as 4:2024cv06172
Defendant:
Allison Pachynski, J. Clark Kelso, R. Steven Tharratt and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Joe Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Nitkin v. Clark et al
as 2:2024cv02233
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Nitkin
Defendant:
Keith Rodgers, Romero and Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2024cv02135
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moses Clark v. Glen E. Pratt
as 2:2024cv06230
Respondent:
Glen E. Pratt
Petitioner:
Moses Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marcus Clarke v. Brian Birkholz
as 2:2024cv05636
Plaintiff:
Marcus Clarke
Defendant:
Warden Brian Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Clark v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00720
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Sacramento Parole Department, Sacramento Probation Department and others
Plaintiff:
Andre James Clark, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Clark v. CDC, et al
as 2:2024cv01748
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Woodland Probation Department, Sacramento Probation Department and others
Plaintiff:
Andre James Clark, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2024cv01627
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatchett v. Clark
as 4:2024cv03246
Respondent:
Warden Ken Clark
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2024cv01390
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
