Cases 1 - 10 of 1,923
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2024cv01627
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatchett v. Clark
as 4:2024cv03246
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Warden Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2024cv01390
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kramer v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2024cv02417
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Kramer
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, J. Clark Kelso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Clem v. Clark
as 2:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Terrill Keith Clem
Defendant:
S. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Contra Costa County Sheriff's
as 3:2024cv01389
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Turner
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriff's, O. Hansen, E. Venrenzuella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kalso v. Butte County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Zachary Lloyd Kalso, Erik Arthur Clarke and Robert Michael Gonzalez
Defendant:
Butte County Jail, Butte County Sheriff Dept., Keefe Supply Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Clark v. Warden, FCI Mendota
as 1:2024cv00211
Petitioner:
Russel Bruce Clark
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bonilla v. Santa Clara Superior Court et al
as 4:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Santa Clara Superior Court, Linda Clark, Raymond Davilla, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ardds v. Clark et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Antoine L. Ardds
Defendant:
Ken Clark, D. Hicks, D. Case and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
