Cases 1 - 10 of 8,254
Coleman v. Parks
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Steve Coleman
Defendant:
Erin Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Annucci et al
as 6:2024cv06388
Plaintiff:
Windsor Coleman
Defendant:
Annucci and Martuscello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tejada- Gonzalez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Victor Tejada- Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Coleman v. John Doe's 1-11 et al
as 3:2024cv50232
Plaintiff:
Sally Coleman
Defendant:
John Doe's 1-11, Jennifer Rold and Courtney Fectz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barton v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 5:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Davis Barton
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Daniel Gallagher, Jr. v. Bradford Coleman, et al
as 24-2217
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Gallagher, Jr.
Defendant:
Bradford Coleman, Missouri State Public Defender and Matthew Mahaffey
Morgan v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2024cv00298
Petitioner:
Robert Lewis Morgan
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nicholas v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
Joshua David Nicholas
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
as 5:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
Roshawn J Davis
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Grant v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00290
Petitioner:
Alchico Grant
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
