Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Williams v. Bunting et al
as 5:2021cv03078
Defendant:
B. Phralcornklen, (fnu) Coleman, (fnu) Griffith and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Lamont Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Johnston
as 5:2020cv03236
Plaintiff:
Deontray D. Coleman
Defendant:
Mike Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coleman v. Commandant
as 5:2019cv03163
Respondent:
United States of America and Commandant
Petitioner:
DaMario A. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brown (ID 95054) v. Lundry et al
as 5:2019cv03152
Defendant:
Debra Lundry, Jennifer Clements, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
William E. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mixon v. Ottawa County Detention Center et al
as 5:2019cv03032
Defendant:
John (lnu), Ottawa County Detention Center and (fnu) Coleman
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Mixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drake et al v. Underwood et al
as 5:2018cv03174
Defendant:
(fnu) McGuire, Winfield Correctional Facility, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ott, Cliff Swarthout, Corey Barfoot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loufer v. Carr et al
as 5:2018cv03144
Plaintiff:
Gregory Charles Loufer
Defendant:
Bill Carr, Dale Coleman, Gordon Willard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis (ID 06598) v. Coleman et al
as 5:2016cv03120
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Defendant:
Samuel Coleman, Hudson Oil Refinery Company, Midland Cooperative Public Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman (ID 6010625) v. Shelton et al
as 5:2015cv03181
Petitioner:
Rasheem A. Coleman
Respondent:
Jay Shelton and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman (ID 6010625) v. Shelton et al
as 5:2015cv03125
Petitioner:
Rasheem A. Coleman
Respondent:
Jay Shelton and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
