Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Reynolds v. Day et al
as 6:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Dashone Marcel Reynolds
Defendant:
Travis Day, Andria Johnson, Rhonda Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avist v. Day et al
as 2:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
Christopher Avist
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graves v. Day et al
as 3:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Steffon Graves
Defendant:
Unknown Day, Cathy Fontenot, Sid Gautreau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Day
as 2:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Donald Arthur Anderson
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. Day et al
as 2:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Frederick Ross
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crosby v. Day
as 5:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Michael Crosby
Defendant:
Travis Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz vs. Day
as 2:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Jared Diaz
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lindsey v. Day et al
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Abe Lindsey
Defendant:
Travis Day and Major Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abrams v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Timothy Abrams
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Travis W Day, Rayburn Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greenup v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2023cv06817
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Greenup
Defendant:
Louisiana State, Jeff Landry, Parish of St. John the Baptist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
