Cases 1 - 10 of 1,073
Swartz v. Owens et al
as 1:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Henry Swartz
Defendant:
Russell Owens, Kelly Nelson, Daniel Rainy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Peterson et al
as 3:2024cv01512
Plaintiff:
Ashton Daniel
Defendant:
J. Peterson, Daniel Monti, Doctor Aorora and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Hale et al
as 2:2024cv02123
Plaintiff:
Katrina Wallace
Defendant:
Danielle Hale, Karyn Conner and US Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01397
Plaintiff:
Darrian Daniels
Defendant:
Anthony Wills and John/Jane 1 Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Budde et al
as 1:2024cv04483
Plaintiff:
Samuel A. Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Budde, James W. Glasgow, Will County Shaffs Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amaya v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv03828
Petitioner:
Daniel Amaya
Respondent:
Chance Jones, Latoya Hughes and Kwame Raoulm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crabb v. Kulhan et al
as 4:2024cv04081
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
Gary Kulhan, Carly Rhoades and Daniel Teel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Monti et al
as 3:2024cv01216
Plaintiff:
Jesus Hernandez
Defendant:
Daniel Monti, Christina Vineyard, Dr. Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
BOP, USA, S Holem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Lake v. State of Indiana et al
as 1:2024cv03451
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
State of Indiana, Benjamin Lopez, Richard D Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
