Cases 1 - 10 of 266
Clemans v. Scarborough et al
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Clemans
Defendant:
J. Scarborough, Brandon Finch, Amber Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Wilson et al
as 5:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Marlon Carpenter
Defendant:
L.T. Troy Wilson, Deanna Noble, Daniel Akers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Wilson et al
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Marlon Carpenter
Defendant:
Troy Wilson, Deanna Noble, Daniel Akers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Kenneth Daniels
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Francis et al v. Green et al
as 0:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
John Francis, Terry Larue, Eric Williams and others
Defendant:
James David Green, Justin Newsome, Boone Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Akers
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Robert Curry
Respondent:
Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garner v. Claud et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ryan Garner
Defendant:
Jailer Ken Claud, Lt. Donald Underwood and Nurse Leesia Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanwinkle v. Sgt Sizemore et al
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Donald Vanwinkle
Defendant:
Sgt Sizemore, C.O. Roberts, R.N. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Akers
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Alastair Couch
Defendant:
Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephenson v. Phillips, et al.
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Brison Stephenson
Defendant:
Phillips, Daniels, Jacob and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
