Cases 1 - 10 of 442
Beckley v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00766
Defendant:
Stephen J. Windhorst, John J. Molaison, Jr. and Marc E. Johnson
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Beckley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prince v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00705
Defendant:
Deedra Whitfield, Brandy McMullen, Eric Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brandon Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Correct Health Solutions et al
as 2:2024cv01944
Defendant:
Unidentified Parties, Dr. Gore, Daniel Fleischman and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Donell Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deloune v. Mahaffey et al
as 3:2024cv00634
Defendant:
Daniel Mahaffey and Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections
Plaintiff:
Demondra Deloune
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Wallace
as 2:2024cv01907
Plaintiff:
Clarence Antoine Daniels
Defendant:
Rhonda Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doucet v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00961
Defendant:
Nolen Bass and Asst Warden Johnson
Plaintiff:
Daniel P Doucet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
Jermal Daniels
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Washington v. City of Bossier et al
as 5:2024cv00799
Defendant:
Julian C Whittington, Jane & John Does, Police Jury Bossier Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Earnestine Saxton Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Fleischman et al
as 2:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
John Edwin Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, J Smith, Unidentified Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aikens v. Rocket Mortgage
as 5:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewayne Aikens
Defendant:
Rocket Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
