Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Davis v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Davis
Defendant:
Scott Semple, James Dzurenda, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Guadarama
as 3:2024cv00278
Petitioner:
Jaquan Davis
Respondent:
Jesus Guadarama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jimenez v. Davis
as 3:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Dayvid Jimenez
Defendant:
Matthew Scott Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
Matthew Davis
Respondent:
E Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wolterstorff v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Robert Munro Wolterstorff III and Robert Munro Wolterstorff, III
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Guadarrama, McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petteway et al v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Taveras, Christopher Q. Petteway, Christopher Deveau and others
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Craig Washington, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vicente v. Wiggins et al
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Luis Vicente
Defendant:
Wiggins, Dougherty, Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. New Haven Correctional Center
as 3:2022cv01631
Plaintiff:
Kharen Colin Davis
Defendant:
New Haven Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Schortman et al
as 3:2022cv01512
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Schortman, Harris, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01206
Plaintiff:
Kharen Davis, Ohireime Osemobor, Juston Martin and others
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Stephen Brunell, Robles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
