Cases 1 - 10 of 1,026
Jaime v. Martuscello et al
as 9:2024cv01114
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello, III, C. Witty-Lewis, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Jaime
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colombe v. Sullivan Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv06993
Plaintiff:
Gerald F. Colombe
Defendant:
Sullivan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koonce v. Rivera et al
as 1:2024cv00812
Defendant:
State of Department C. F., Sergeant Rivera and C.O. Hogan
Plaintiff:
Norman Lee Koonce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Mastraccio et al
as 9:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Jalen Holmes and Jalen Homles
Defendant:
F. Mastraccio and Ciancio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. Ramseier
as 9:2024cv01006
Petitioner:
Keith Darnell Fair
Respondent:
William F. Ramseier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilder v. Martucello et al
as 9:2024cv00977
Defendant:
Denisha A. Goodman and Daniel F. Martucello, III
Plaintiff:
Titus Wilder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyers v. Martuscello et al
as 9:2024cv00962
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello, III, John or Jane Doe and Anne Marie McGrath
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherrod v. Martuscello
as 9:2024cv00950
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello
Plaintiff:
Eugene Sherrod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpkins v. Hilton et al
as 9:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Michael Simpkins
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello, III, J. Christopher, B. Hilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Corey
as 1:2024cv00655
Respondent:
Cpt. Joseph Corey
Petitioner:
Willie F. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
