Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Beasley v. State Of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gilbert Beasley, Jr.
Defendant:
State Of Georgia, Sandy Hodson and Attorney General Chris Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. Bobbit
as 1:2023cv02576
Petitioner:
Ernest Gilbert
Respondent:
Trevonta Bobbit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRAYSON v. WALKER et al
as 4:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
GILBERT G GRAYSON
Defendant:
Warden HERBERT WALKER and MUSCOGEE COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weise v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00106
Petitioner:
Gilbert Nelson Weise, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Garcia v. Brooks et al
as 3:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo Jose Garcia
Defendant:
Radford S Brooks, J.D. Brooks, T.R. Yeagar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirk v. March et al
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Kirk
Defendant:
COI March and Georgia Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILBERT v. GEORGIA et al
as 4:2021cv00195
Plaintiff:
CALVIN GILBERT
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, WARDEN DESHAWN JONES, GREG RICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. State of Georgia
as 1:2021cv00167
Petitioner:
Calvin Gilbert
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRADDY v. MERRITT et al
as 4:2021cv00144
Plaintiff:
RONALD JERMAINE GRADDY
Defendant:
PEYTON MERRITT, CHANDLER BUCHANAN and DERRELL GILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2021cv00105
Petitioner:
CALVIN GILBERT
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
