Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Cozart v. Tulsa County Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Delmond Cornell Cozart
Defendant:
Tulsa County Sheriff Office, Vic Regalado, Detention Officer Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bearman v. Gonzalez et al
as 5:2022cv00805
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Bearman
Defendant:
Gonzalez Pest Control, Mr. Joseph Gonzalez and Mr. Scott Ely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Farris
as 5:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Hilario Gonzalez
Defendant:
Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Farris
as 6:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Hilaro Gonzalez
Defendant:
Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tamez v. Gonzalez et al
as 5:2022cv00540
Plaintiff:
Darryl Tamez
Defendant:
Abel Gonzalez and Cynthia Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Northern District of Oklahoma
as 5:2020cv00247
Respondent:
Northern District of Oklahoma
Petitioner:
Jose Reyes Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez-Morales v. Farley
as 5:2019cv00009
Respondent:
Robert Farley
Petitioner:
Fernando Gonzalez-Morales, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez v. Martin
as 5:2018cv00297
Petitioner:
Exiquio Gonzalez
Respondent:
Jimmy Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez v. Stephens County District Attorney Office et al
as 5:2017cv00949
Plaintiff:
Pedro Antonio Gonzalez
Defendant:
Stephens County District Attorney Office and Jerry Herberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.