Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HOOKS v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTION et al
as 2:2020cv01116
Defendant: SAMIRRAH MINNIS, TANISHA DAVIS, MILANO GIANNONE and others
Plaintiff: OMAR HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOKS v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2018cv05507
Defendant: GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, KEVIN M. CONROY, WARDEN DAVID BARNE and others
Plaintiff: OMAR HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOK v. SMITH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv04635
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner: BRIAN HOOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOOKS v. MINCEY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv03351
Plaintiff: TARIK HOOKS
Defendant: MR. KEVIN V. MINCEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOKS
as 2:2018cv03000
HOOK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03472
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: TRACEY HOOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HOOKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv00327
Petitioner: TARIK HOOKS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HOOKS v. WINGARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv05250
Petitioner: HAROLD HOOKS
Respondent: TREVOR WINGARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOOKS v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv03635
Petitioner: OMAR RASHAD HOOKS
Respondent: JOHN E WETZEL, LAUREL HARRY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOOKS v. DOVE et al
as 2:2013cv00534
Plaintiff: OMAR HOOKS
Defendant: WILLIAM DOVE, JOHN REILLY and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?