Cases 1 - 10 of 302
Price v. Burke
as 0:2024cv01409
Plaintiff:
Paul Vincent Price
Defendant:
George J. Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Traylor v. Buck et al
as 0:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Rayco D Traylor
Defendant:
J Buck, J Moldenhauer, Dr. Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solberg v. Eischen et al
as 0:2023cv03589
Petitioner:
John M. Solberg
Respondent:
B. Eischen, J. Kozulla, S. Hachey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Solberg v. Eischen et al
as 0:2023cv03568
Petitioner:
John M. Solberg
Respondent:
B. Eischen, J. Kozulla, S. Hachey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03264
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Stamps v. United States of America et al
as 0:2023cv03014
Plaintiff:
Alessandra Katie Stamps
Defendant:
United States of America, Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henny v. United States of America et al
as 0:2023cv02773
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
United States of America, Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Rardin et al
as 0:2023cv02746
Plaintiff:
David J. Lewis
Defendant:
Warden Jared Rardin, Dr. Elaine York and A. Herzog
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02718
Petitioner:
Christopher J Gonzalez
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hines v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02692
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
