Cases 1 - 10 of 30
CAMPBELL v. DIXON et al
as 5:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CAMPBELL
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, T BOWDEN, A KEATON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Sgt. Crandall, Sgt. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keaton v. Cartwright et al
as 3:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
Robert James Keaton
Defendant:
James B. Cartwright, Anthony L. Smith, Howard A. Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL LEANDER COOPER
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, J K BUTLER, M SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keaton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2021cv01257
Defendant:
Robert Keaton
Respondent:
Office of the Attorney General of the State of Florida, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. Colombani, et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Defendant:
Dr. Leslie Colombani, R. Polk, A Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hook v. McCray et al
as 3:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc. Now, R.M.C. Colonel, Dr. Sharma and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCSWAIN v. HAND et al
as 4:2020cv00423
Defendant:
J COKER, V HOUCK, E HAND and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GLENN MCSWAIN, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALI v. CLOUD et al
as 5:2020cv00209
Defendant:
SNOWDEN, A KEATON, T STEWART and others
Plaintiff:
DARYL CHARLES ALI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Inch et al
as 1:2020cv22464
Defendant:
A. Keaton, K. Williams, Mario Corrales and others
Plaintiff:
Dusty L. Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
