Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Morton v. Varga et al
as 4:2023cv04117
Plaintiff:
Quintan Morton
Defendant:
John Varga, John Doe 1, East Moline Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Varga et al
as 3:2023cv02507
Plaintiff:
Quintan J Morton
Defendant:
John R Varga, John Doe 1, East Moline Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritter v. Muskegon County Prosecutor et al
as 1:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ritter
Defendant:
Muskegon County Prosecutor, Morton Shores, Michigan Cheif of Police and Morton Shores, Michigan Chief of Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Bergami et al
as 3:2022cv50205
Petitioner:
Michael DeWayne Morton
Respondent:
Bergami and Gonzalez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Morton v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv01862
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Morton
Defendant:
Thomas J Dart, Martinez, Szul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Ciolli
as 3:2022cv50060
Petitioner:
Michael DeWayne Morton and Supreme Black God
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Morton v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2022cv50010
Plaintiff:
Michael DeWayne Morton
Defendant:
A. Ciolli and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Morton v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2022cv50011
Plaintiff:
Michael DeWayne Morton
Defendant:
A. Ciolli, Food Service Department and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Morton v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2021cv50480
Plaintiff:
Michael DeWayne Morton
Defendant:
A. Ciolli, Rivers, Ms. Rainmaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Morton v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2021cv50470
Plaintiff:
Michael DeWayne Morton
Defendant:
A. Ciolli and Dr. Levy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
