Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Boey v. Brunswick Hills Township et al.
as 1:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Adam Joshua Boey
Defendant:
Brunswick Hills Township, City of Brunswick, Przemyslaw Piekut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Osborne et al
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Joson Carroll
Defendant:
Rodney Osborne, Officer Crabtree, Officer Fitzgarold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osborne v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2022cv00529
Petitioner:
Donna Kay Osborne
Respondent:
State of Ohio and U.S. Federal Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Duncan et al
as 3:2022cv00614
Plaintiff:
Aaron Davis
Defendant:
Tyler W.A. Duncan, Dale R. Osborn, Brandon Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Lucey et al
as 1:2022cv00427
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jacob Smith and Jacob Smith
Defendant:
Mr. David Lucey, Mr. Mark Osborne, Mr. Nelson Laboy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McRae v. Correctional Officer Frye, et al
as 2:2021cv04962
Plaintiff:
Troy Delano McRae
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Frye and Correctional Officer Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Erdos et al
as 1:2021cv00104
Defendant:
Major Galloway, Joshua Gullett, Linnea Mahlman and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Osborne et al
as 1:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Koch Edwin, Sergeant Barney Brian and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Erdos et al
as 1:2020cv00769
Defendant:
Major Galloway, John Doe 1-3, Officer Gullet and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborne v. Williams
as 4:2020cv02077
Petitioner:
Bryan Aaron Osborne
Respondent:
Warden Brian K. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
