Cases 1 - 10 of 255
Thorson v. Polk County District Attorneys Office et al
as 9:2024cv00144
Respondent:
Polk County District Attorneys Office and Polk County Sheriffs Office
Plaintiff:
Harley Alexander Thorson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. Lumpkin
as 9:2024cv00092
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Mavis Ray Polk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fregia v. Warden Marshall, et al.
as 6:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
Kirk Asa Fregia, Sr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Defendant:
Sgt. John Doe, Warden Unknown Marshall, Brian Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv01097
Petitioner:
Nelson Alexander Polk
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Polk v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00726
Petitioner:
Mavis Ray Polk
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polk v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
James Lee Polk
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polk v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00147
Petitioner:
James Lee Polk
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polk v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
James Lee Polk
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polk v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00446
Petitioner:
James Lee Polk
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polk v. Guzman
as 1:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
James Lee Polk
Defendant:
A Guzman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
