Cases 1 - 10 of 40
ROSARIO-SANCHEZ v. ESCOBAR-ESCOBAR
as 2:2023cv20740
Plaintiff:
ANGEL I ROSARIO-SANCHEZ
Defendant:
LUIS ADOLFO ESCOBAR-ESCOBAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSARIO-SANCHEZ v. GRULLON
as 2:2023cv03960
Plaintiff:
ANGEL I ROSARIO-SANCHEZ
Defendant:
J. GRULLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSARIO-SANCHEZ v. CORPORAL H. SOLIS et al
as 2:2023cv03687
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ROASARIO-SANCHEZ and ANGEL ROSARIO-SANCHEZ
Defendant:
CORPORAL H. SOLIS and DR. IBRAHIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSARIO v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2020cv09924
Plaintiff:
GERARDO ROSARIO
Defendant:
WARDEN DAVID ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DEL ROSARIO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv19019
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
BENITO DEL ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MIRAGLIA v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2018cv07944
Petitioner:
ROSARIO MIRAGLIA
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STEVEN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROSARIO v. DEPARTMENT OF CITIZEN SERVICES et al
as 2:2017cv02971
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN ROSARIO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CITIZEN SERVICES , DIVISION OF YOUTH SERVICES , JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2016cv09227
Petitioner:
ANTHONY ROSARIO
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY M. LANIGAN, JOHN FALVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROSARIO v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECITONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07802
Plaintiff:
ARMANDO ROSARIO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECITONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES-ROSARIO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv07434
Plaintiff:
JOHAN TORRES-ROSARIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
