Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Escobedo v. Gonzales, et al.
as 1:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Omar Escobedo
Defendant:
Kiera Burgin Gonzales, Sgt. Gresick, Sgt. J. Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pizzuto v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Gerald Ross Pizzuto
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Timothy Richardson, RAUL LABRADOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Jimmy C Moore
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt, Alberto Ramirez, Timothy Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pizzuto v. Richardson
as 1:2022cv00452
Petitioner:
Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Tim Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pehringer v. Lehtinen
as 1:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Adam Ross Pehringer, SR
Defendant:
Erik Lehtinen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sileoni v. Hammon et al
as 1:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Ashley Hammon, Kaylene Hartt, Tanya Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Eric Swain Johnson
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt, Patrick Jones, Bree Derrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pehringer v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Adam Ross Pehringer, SR
Defendant:
State of Idaho and Jason D Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pehringer v. Tewalt
as 1:2021cv00515
Petitioner:
Sr Adam Ross Pehringer and Adam Ross Pehringer
Respondent:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodrick v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Bree Derrick, Ross Castleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
