Cases 1 - 10 of 2,510
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06680
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06681
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 3:2024cv01666
Plaintiff:
John Bennett Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Food For Less Store Manager and The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Goodlow v. Broomfield, et al.,
as 2:2024cv02498
Defendant:
Broomfield, Santos, Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Sherode Goodlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myron Smith v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2024cv07764
Plaintiff:
Myron Smith
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department and Robert Luna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Allison et al
as 4:2024cv06172
Defendant:
Allison Pachynski, J. Clark Kelso, R. Steven Tharratt and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Joe Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Food 4 Less et al
as 3:2024cv01561
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and Food 4 Less
Plaintiff:
John Bennett Smith, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Bratton v. Oak Smith
as 2:2024cv07384
Respondent:
Oak Smith
Petitioner:
Ronald Bratton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. San Francisco Ca. Sup.
as 3:2024cv05790
Defendant:
San Francisco Ca. Sup.
Petitioner:
Anthony Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Dailey v. Smith
as 2:2024cv02249
Petitioner:
Myron Dailey
Defendant:
Steven Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
