Cases 1 - 10 of 20
SPENCER-HILL et al v. ACJF et al
as 1:2024cv05515
Plaintiff:
JASON T. SPENCER-HILL, ATEBA MAME HASSAN, NOBLE EL and others
Defendant:
ACJF, ACPS, DAVID KELSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCER-HILL v. KELSEY
as 1:2024cv05402
Petitioner:
JASON T. SPEUCER-HILL and JASON T. SPENCER-HILL
Respondent:
DAVID KELSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
YOUNG v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv04853
Petitioner:
SPENCER YOUNG
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPENCER v. RICHARD et al
as 1:2021cv05111
Defendant:
WARDEN SMITH T. RICHARD, ALAN DIAS and WARDEN RICHARD T. SMITH
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. SPENCER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARCHIE et al v. CHETIRKIN et al
as 1:2021cv01095
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ARCHIE, SR., ALUJAMA SHAKUR, KAREEM BLOCKER and others
Defendant:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN, SOUTHERN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, NAME UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv05340
Petitioner:
SHAAMEL SPENCER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SPENCER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv04777
Petitioner:
SHAAMEL SPENCER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HAYES v. SMITH et al
as 1:2016cv09066
Plaintiff:
JAMIE HAYES
Defendant:
SPENCER SMITH, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, KEVIN R FRANCHVILLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCER v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07374
Plaintiff:
ANDRE S. SPENCER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07236
Plaintiff:
SPENCER THOMPSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
