Cases 1 - 10 of 42
SIMMONS v. NJDOC
as 3:2021cv19975
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE W. SIMMONS
Defendant:
NJDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARCHIE et al v. COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND et al
as 1:2021cv18334
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ARCHIE and TARA SIMMONS ARCHIE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND, OFFICER CORDOVA, OFFICER BERMUDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. ORTIZ
as 1:2020cv14883
Petitioner:
JOE SIMMONS
Respondent:
DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ARCHIE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv12888
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ARCHIE, SR.
Defendant:
DR. ALAN DIAS and RICHARD T. SMITH
Interested Party:
TARA D. SIMMONS-ARCHIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARCHIE et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv07907
Defendant:
JODY HIRATA, RICHARD SMITH and CHARLES WARREN
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ARCHIE, SR., RAYMOND LAMAR BROWN, JOHN CLARK and others
Interested Party:
TARA D. SIMMONS-ARCHIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARCHIE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv07487
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ARCHIE
Defendant:
SAMANTHA LNU, KEEFE CORPORATION, RICHARD T. SMITH and others
Interested Party:
TARA D. SIMMONS-ARCHIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2020cv03028
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
VERNON L. SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SIMMONS v. KELSEY et al
as 1:2020cv01561
Defendant:
KEEFEE COMPANY and WARDEN DAVID KELSEY
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WILLIAM SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v.KELSEY et al
as 1:2020cv00967
Defendant:
DAVID KELSEY, ARAMARK and ATLANTIC COUNTY FREEHOLDERS
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WILLIAM SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. ROXBURY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv02526
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY W. SIMMONS
Defendant:
ROXBURY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, MORRIS COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, DENVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
