Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Grandinetti v. Ronolo et al
as 1:2021cv00147
Defendant:
ACO III R. Dombiwski, ACO 111 Ronolo, Lt. Wakuta and others
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00504
Petitioner:
David V. Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rideout v. Sakai et al
as 1:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
Monty V. Rideout
Defendant:
Ted Sakai, Al Beavers, Max Utani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rideout v. Hawaii Paroling Authority, State of Hawaii
as 1:2014cv00104
Petitioner:
Monty V. Rideout
Respondent:
Hawaii Paroling Authority, State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodenhurst v. Maesaka-Hirata et al
as 1:2012cv00040
Petitioner:
Walter V. Rodenhurst, III
Respondent:
Jodie Maesaka-Hirata and David Louie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kaawa et al v. State of Hawaii, Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2011cv00702
Petitioner:
David Kaawa, V, Tatianna Kaawa, Kainalu Kaawa and others
Respondent:
State of Hawaii, Department of Human Services, Lloyd Van De Car, Susan McCree and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campos v. Shellko et al
as 1:2010cv00208
Plaintiff:
Paul Lanakila Campos
Defendant:
Lee Shellko, V. Roybal, P. Farabough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodenhurst vs. State of Hawaii; et al.
as 1:2008cv00396
Plaintiff:
Walter V. Rodenhurst, III
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Kay Bauman, Kenneth Zienkiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodenhurst v. Bauman et al
as 1:2008cv00382
Petitioner:
Walter V. Rodenhurst, III
Respondent:
Kay Bauman, Clayton Frank and State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodenhurst v. Bauman et al
as 1:2008cv00381
Petitioner:
Walter V. Rodenhurst, III
Respondent:
Kay Bauman, Clayton Frank and State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
