Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Carter v. Butler et al
as 1:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
Mausean Q.V. Carter
Defendant:
Bradley Butler, Edward Davis, C. McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gopshes v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00854
Petitioner:
Cokie Joe Gopshes, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Judge William V. Tucker and Clerk of Court Wayne Robery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rainey v. Bailey
as 1:2023cv03160
Plaintiff:
Frank V. Rainey
Defendant:
B. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Monson v. Hobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Dayna Nicole Monson
Defendant:
Rachel Hobbs, D. Law, Capt. Chrisp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilder v. Warden
as 1:2022cv03264
Petitioner:
Lawrence V. Wilder
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Frederick County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2022cv01406
Plaintiff:
Joshua Colonna Jones
Defendant:
Frederick County Adult Detention Center, Sheriff Charles A. Jenkins, William V. Delautes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pevia v. Hill et al
as 1:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Pevia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Corr Wayne Hill, G. Warren, Warden, R. Roderick, Asst. Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal-Williams v. Addison, et al
as 1:2021cv03280
Plaintiff:
Rodjuan Orland James Neal-Williams
Defendant:
Addison, Oputa, Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00876
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Haughie v. U.S. et al
as 8:2021cv00101
Defendant:
W. Hill, Security Guard Patterson, B. Swan-Mace and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Haughie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
