Cases 1 - 10 of 48
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherfield et al v. Diaz et al
as 5:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Sherfield, Sr, Leslie R Loyd, Taufano CT Guyton and others
Defendant:
FNU Diaz, FNU Leath and Mike Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newton v. Diaz et al
as 5:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
Derrick V Newton, Jr
Defendant:
FNU Diaz, FNU Leath and Mike Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. SSI Satellite Sericer Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00711
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Baldwin
Defendant:
SSI Satellite Sericer Inc, FNU Morgan, FNU Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cisneros v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv00430
Petitioner:
Michael V Cisneros
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lester v. Whitten et al
as 5:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamar Lester
Defendant:
Rick Whitten, Ms. V Howes, Mrs. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Whitten et al
as 6:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamar Lester
Defendant:
Rick Whitten, Ms. V Howes, Mrs. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Crow
as 4:2021cv00527
Petitioner:
Nathan V. Allen and Nathan V Allen
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wonsch v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2021cv00826
Petitioner:
Robert V Wonsch
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cisneros v. Gomez et al
as 5:2021cv00825
Plaintiff:
Michael V Cisneros
Defendant:
Sheriffs Deputy Gomez and Oklahoma County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
