Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Chanh Trinh et al v. Brian Birkholz et al
as 2:2023cv04521
Plaintiff:
Chanh V. Trinh, Brian E. Sawyers, Dennis McPherson and others
Defendant:
Brian Birkholz, Bureau of Prisons, Law Office of Manatt, Phelps, and Phillips, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivan Lee Matthews II v. Twin Towers Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2022cv09420
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lee Matthews, II
Defendant:
Twin Towers Correctional Facility, Los Angeles Sherrifs Department, Los Angeles County Jail System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivan Lee Matthews II v. North County Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2022cv07962
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lee Matthews, II
Defendant:
North County Correctional Facility, Twin Towers Correctional Facility 1 and 2, Los Angeles Sheriffs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valencia Barrera v. Los Angeles Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2020cv09926
Defendant:
ACLU, Judge Michael Villalobos, Los Angeles Sheriffs Department and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Osiel Valencia Barrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arturo Osiel Valencia Barrera v. The Los Angeles Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2020cv09443
Defendant:
ACLU, Deputy Bassett, Joseph Iniguez and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Osiel Valencia Barrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawn D.A. Fletcher v. ACLU Jail Project
as 2:2016cv08725
Defendant:
ACLU Jail Project
Plaintiff:
Shawn D.A. Fletcher
Grandinetti v. Hawaii-ACLU Consent Decree Officials et al
as 3:2013cv00078
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Defendant:
Hawaii-ACLU Consent Decree Officials, State of Hawaii and Various Law Firms, George R. Ariyoshi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. Monroe et al
as 2:2009cv00527
Plaintiff:
Douglas Wayne McCray
Defendant:
Monroe, Mitchell, Blackthorn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
