Cases 1 - 10 of 10
AHMAD v. ALFARO et al
as 3:2022cv07512
Plaintiff:
ZAKARIYYA AHMAD
Defendant:
SGT. H. ALFARO, OFFICER MILLER and OFFICER RILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHIE v. FOX et al
as 1:2022cv03267
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ARCHIE
Defendant:
STACEY FOX, THERAPIST ANGIE, DR. AHMAD SHAKIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AHMAD v. NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2021cv19996
Plaintiff:
AHMAD ZAKARIYYA and ZAKARIYYA AHMAD
Defendant:
NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSES et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv17074
Plaintiff:
AHMAD MOSES, KAMILAH WALLER, SAMIR YUSEF RAHEEM MOSES and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv14629
Petitioner:
AHMAD MANN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
AHMAD v. HUDSON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE NARCOTICS TASK FORCE et al
as 2:2015cv08994
Plaintiff:
MUSADDIQ AHMAD
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE NARCOTICS TASK FORCE, NORMAN DOUGLAS GLOVER, JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2015cv08896
Petitioner:
AHMAD JOHNSON
Respondent:
STEPHEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROURK v. CHOWANEC et al
as 2:2011cv02772
Plaintiff:
AHMAD ROURK
Defendant:
WALTER CHOWANEC, COSTIGAN, SCANLON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLER v. HAUCK et al
as 2:2008cv02716
Petitioner:
AHMAD WALLER
Respondent:
BRUCE HAUCK and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WALEER v. SHERRER et al
as 2:2007cv01607
Petitioner:
AHMAD WALLER
Respondent:
LLYDELL SHERRER and STUART RABNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
