Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Sullens v. Wise County Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Everett Jesse Sullens
Defendant:
Wise County Sheriff Office, Chad Lanier, Charles Bryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Headspeth v Akin et al
as 4:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
Robin Headspeth
Defendant:
N Lane Akin, Brandon S. Wood and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Houston et al
as 4:2022cv00715
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jace Smith
Defendant:
FNU Houston, Wise County, Wise County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00136
Petitioner:
Ryan Anthony Akins
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Wise County Detention Center et al
as 4:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Royce Wood
Defendant:
Wise County Detention Center, Lank Akin, FNU Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Love
as 4:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
James L Sims, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. FNU Love, FNU Love, Wise County Sherriff Dep. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akins v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv01978
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
David V. Akins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McBryde v. Akin et al
as 4:2020cv00943
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles McBryde
Defendant:
Rick Denney, Wise County Jail, K. Sartor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullens v. Wise County Sheriff Office
as 4:2020cv00827
Respondent:
Wise County Sheriff Office and Lane Akin
Petitioner:
Everett Jesse Sullens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wanzer v. Rayford et al
as 5:2020cv00779
Defendant:
FNU Wolf, FNU Alexander, Phonso J. Rayford and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wanzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
