Cases 1 - 10 of 32,438
Ortiz-Carrasquillo v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00368
Petitioner:
Giovanni Janick Ortiz-Carrasquillo and Giovanni Janick Ortiz
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Williams v. Fletcher et al
as 7:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. Fletcher, Mr. Creech, Mr. Sheppard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodman v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Goodman
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Khamari Hunter
Defendant:
Trisha Brown, Gabe Morgan and Garrett Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Thomas
as 7:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Alexis Anderson
Defendant:
Lt. P. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lassiter v. Greensville Correctional Center
as 7:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee Lassiter
Defendant:
Greensville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdussalaam v. The State of Virginia et al
as 3:2024cv00410
Petitioner:
Munir-Ibn Sami Abdussalaam
Respondent:
The State of Virginia, Amherst County Adult Detention Center and Appomattox Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cotton v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Cotton
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Working
as 3:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Walter Ferguson
Defendant:
John Working
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
