Cases 1 - 10 of 1,370
Canty v. Lammer
as 1:2024cv04028
Petitioner:
Anthony Canty
Respondent:
B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Johnson
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills, Nurse Crane, Nurse Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canty v. Lammer
as 4:2024cv04091
Petitioner:
Anthony Canty
Respondent:
B Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mosley v. County Of Will et al
as 1:2024cv03792
Plaintiff:
Johnathan N Mosley
Defendant:
County Of Will, Nicolas Keedy, Anthony Gomez Delacasa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. Illinois
as 3:2024cv01251
Petitioner:
Anthony Thomas Dewayne Woodard and Anthony D Woodard
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01248
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Walker, Terrance Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01232
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Officer Baker and Lance Korando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01233
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Lieutenant Blake, Lieutenant Chiggy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Crow et al
as 1:2024cv03626
Petitioner:
Derrick Anthony Angelos Baldwin
Respondent:
Christel Crow, Kimberly Hvarre and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schargorodsky v. Ek et al
as 2:2024cv02090
Plaintiff:
Anthony Schargorodsky
Defendant:
Jonathan Ek, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Jennifer Chacon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
