Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Williamson v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02697
Petitioner:
Anthony Antone Williamson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carlton v. Chapman
as 3:2021cv00075
Petitioner:
Anton Carlton
Respondent:
Arvil Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Rutherford County Sherriff Office et al
as 3:2019cv00941
Plaintiff:
Donte Anton Davis
Defendant:
f/n/u Dowdy and Rutherford County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Maximum Correctional Center, Davidson County Jail
as 3:2018cv00718
Plaintiff:
Anton Thompson
Defendant:
Maximum Correctional Center, Davidson County Jail and Maximum Correctional Center, Davidson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2018cv00610
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office and Daron Hall
Plaintiff:
Anton Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarbrough v. Jackson et al
as 2:2018cv02443
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons, United States District Court, Warden Jackson and others
Petitioner:
Anton Yarbrough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thompson v. State of Tennessee District Attorney General's Office et al
as 3:2018cv00502
Plaintiff:
Anton L. Thompson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee District Attorney General's Office and Glen Funk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Joyner
as 3:2018cv00423
Plaintiff:
Anton L. Thompson
Defendant:
Ruby Joyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Sessions et al (TV2)
as 1:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Anton D McDonald
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions, Ian Heath Gershengorn, The 114th Congress of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armour v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02467
Petitioner:
Anton Armour
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
