Cases 1 - 10 of 16
(PC) TerVeer v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv03048
Plaintiff:
Justin Ryan TerVeer
Defendant:
Gena Jones, Howard E. Moseley, Brunner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huynh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al
as 3:2021cv04039
Defendant:
P. Sullivan, B. Avina, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and others
Plaintiff:
Tri Huu Huynh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avina v. Koening et al
as 3:2021cv02433
Plaintiff:
Ernesto A. Avina
Defendant:
Mark Kowall, M. Chua, Samuel Grodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huynh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al
as 3:2018cv05670
Defendant:
P. Sullivan, C. Martella, Correction Officer Alamo and others
Plaintiff:
Tri Huu Huynh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2018cv02631
Plaintiff:
Leon L. Meyers
Defendant:
C. Hernandez, K. Mendoza and B. Avina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salvador Avina v. Jeffrey Beard
as 2:2016cv01524
Petitioner:
Salvador Avina
Respondent:
Jeffrey Beard
Avina v. Unknown
as 1:2014cv00943
Petitioner:
Michael Avina
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia, Jr. v. Tulare County Main Jail et al
as 1:2014cv00476
Plaintiff:
Omar Garcia, Jr.
Defendant:
Tulare County Main Jail, M. O'Rafferty, C. Kaious and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2013cv03785
Plaintiff:
Terrance Hamilton, Charlie Lee Million and Devon Davis
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., George Giurbino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose Ann Fernandez v. CDCR et al
as 5:2013cv00203
Defendant:
J V Allen, J V Allen, M L Alvarado and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Ann Fernandez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
