Cases 1 - 10 of 21
AL-HAWSAWI v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02907
Petitioner:
MUSTAFA AHMED ADAM AL-HAWSAWI
Respondent:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and LANCE A. OKAMURA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AHMED v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv01189
Defendant:
FRANK LARA, IAN CONNORS, SARA M. REVELL and others
Plaintiff:
FAROOQUE AHMED
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
SAFARINI v. ASHCROFT et al
as 1:2017cv00430
Plaintiff:
ZAID HASSAN ABD LATIF SAFARINI
Defendant:
JOHN ASHCROFT, ROBERT MUELLER, BRAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANDIVERE et al v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv01594
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOW VANDIVERE and JON KARL THOMPSON
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH , ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , THOMAS KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AL-HAWSAWI v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2015cv01257
Petitioner:
MUSTAFA AHMED ADAM AL-HAWSAWI
Respondent:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II , ASHTON B. CARTER , JOSE R. MONTEAGUDO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AL-ALWI v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2015cv00681
Petitioner:
MOATH HAMZA AHMED AL-ALWI
Respondent:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, ASHTON B. CARTER, KYLE J. COZAD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AL-HAJ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
AHMED MOHAMMED AL-HAJ
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JEFF GRONDOLSKY, CLINICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. AHMED et al
as 1:2011cv02105
Plaintiff:
OMONI JOHNSON
Defendant:
MAQAS AHMED and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DETENTION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
GODDARD v. AHMED
as 1:2011cv02053
Plaintiff:
DELONTE GODDARD
Defendant:
W. AHMED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMLILY et al v. GATES et al
as 1:2008cv01628
Petitioner:
MUSTAFA AHMED HAMLILY, MUSTAFA AHMED HAMLILY, MUSTAFA AIT IDIR and others
Respondent:
ROBERT GATES, HARRY B. HARRIS and MIKE BUMGARNER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
