Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Alva v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv00371
Plaintiff:
Felipe Javier Alva
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Guerrero v. Turner et al
as 4:2017cv00386
Plaintiff:
Fernando Guerrero
Defendant:
Sylvester Turner, Martha I. Montalvo, Art Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Dixon et al
as 5:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Candido Alva Diaz
Defendant:
Kerry Dixon and Giles W. Dalby Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Unknown Bexar County Detention Officers
as 5:2011cv00052
Defendant:
Deputy FNU Alva, Bexar County Adult Detention Center, Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
Joaquin R. Rivera, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alva v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 5:2009cv00145
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Monsiva Alva
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States, Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Alva v. Tate et al
as 4:2009cv01790
Plaintiff:
Kevin Alva
Defendant:
Randy Tate, Edna Mitchell, Rissi L Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moses v. Guzman et al
as 5:2008cv00672
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Moses, Sr.
Defendant:
FNU Guzman, FNU Olaic, Luis P. Alva and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alva et al
as 9:2008cv00046
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Kevin Alva
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McGrath v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv02713
Petitioner:
Alva Zane McGrath, Jr.
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alva v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv01703
Petitioner:
Rodney Kevin Alva
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
