Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McElmeel v. Perlow et al
as 6:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Samuel Peter McElmeel
Defendant:
Patricia W. Perlow, Eric T Knapp, Spencer Gwartney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sandoval v. Sundquist
as 3:2023cv01906
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Edward Sandoval, Jr.
Respondent:
Ms. Amber Sundquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steward v. Sundquist
as 3:2023cv01729
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Steward
Respondent:
Amber Sundquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Randall et al
as 3:2023cv01147
Plaintiff:
Nimrod B.H. Taylor
Defendant:
Christopher Randall and Ms. Amber Sundquist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
York v. State of Oregon
as 3:2023cv01054
Petitioner:
Nicholas T. York
Respondent:
State of Oregon and Superintendent Amber Sundquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv00951
Plaintiff:
James Ervin Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Governor Tina Kotek, Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmidt v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2021cv01593
Plaintiff:
Amber Schmidt
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Bob L. Boylan and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorrden v. Transgender and Intersex Committee et al
as 2:2020cv00122
Defendant:
Officer D. Fletcher, Officer M. Pinson, Officer L. Northrup and others
Plaintiff:
Amber Danielle Thorrden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Nelson et al
as 2:2019cv01210
Defendant:
Jose Olvera, Steve Boston, Michelle Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byers v. Hughs et al
as 2:2019cv00429
Defendant:
Amber Terry, Asst. Supt. Jackson, Lt. Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jerome Byers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
