Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Apostle and Prophet Yashua v. Pastor Melissa Scott et al
as 2:2023cv08987
Petitioner:
Apostle and Prophet Yashua
Respondent:
Pastor Melissa Scott and State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Vienna Correctional Center et al
as 3:2018cv00425
Plaintiff:
Gregory Williams
Defendant:
Vienna Correctional Center, Wexford Health Source's, Inc., Kevin Halloran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronnie Brown v. Jerry Brown, et al
as 17-56180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE O. BROWN, AKA Rodney Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, Governor, State of California, JIM MCDONALD, Sheriff of Los Angeles County/Los Angeles County Sherriff's Department, CHARLIE BECK, Chief of the Los Angeles Police Department, City of Los Angeles and others
Ronnie Brown v. Jerry Brown, et al
as 17-56050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE O. BROWN, AKA Rodney Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, Governor, State of California, JIM MCDONALD, Sheriff of Los Angeles County/Los Angeles County Sherriff's Department, CHARLIE BECK, Chief of the Los Angeles Police Department, City of Los Angeles and others
Wiggins v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2017cv00583
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Wiggins
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Joseph Yurkovich, Alfonso David and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Brown et al
as 1:2017cv03025
Plaintiff:
Ronnie O. Brown
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, John Doel, Omar Lustra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronnie O. Brown v. State of California et al
as 2:2017cv03121
Sergeant Apostle LACSD:
Sergeant Apostle
Respondent:
Jean-Rene Basle, Chief Charlie Beck, Jerry Brown and others
Petitioner:
Ronnie O Brown
Brown v. Brown et al
as 1:2017cv01412
Plaintiff:
Ronnie O. Brown
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Jim McDonald, Jim McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
