Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Williams v. DeKalb County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01797
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Augustus Williams
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail, Former Sheriff: Jeffery Mann, Head Sheriff: Melody Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Superior Court of Bulloch County et al
as 6:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Rodricus D. Scott
Defendant:
Superior Court of Bulloch County, Bulloch County Sheriff Office/Bulloch County Jail, Judge June Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustus Miller, Jr. v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00077
Petitioner:
Augustus Miller, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ware v. Partain
as 4:2016cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Augustus Ware
Defendant:
Jack Partain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WARE v. PHILBIN
as 4:2016cv00207
Petitioner:
Jarvis Augustus Ware
Respondent:
Edward Philbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ware v. Philbin et al
as 4:2015cv00035
Petitioner:
Jarvis Augustus Ware
Respondent:
Edward Philbin and Samuel S. Olens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ware v. Nelson et al
as 4:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Augustus Ware
Defendant:
Betty J. Nelson and Sam F. Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. Chatman
as 4:2011cv00160
Petitioner:
Jarvis Augustus Ware
Respondent:
Bruce Chatman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ware v. Montgomery et al
as 4:2009cv00083
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Augustus Ware
Defendant:
Joe Montgomery, Jeff Howard and David Headrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Ware et al v. Autry State Prison et al
as 1:2009cv00013
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Augustus Ware, James Jennings and Prisoners Subjected To Triple Ceiling
Defendant:
Autry State Prison, Georgia Department of Corrections and Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
