Cases 1 - 10 of 1,911
Taylor v. Ebersole et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Dylan Eugene Taylor
Defendant:
Miranda B. Ebersole and FNU Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyon v. Collier et al Case as to Joe Tovar only electronically transferred to the Northern District of Texas- Amarillo.
as 1:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Edward B. Lyon, Jr.
Defendant:
Chairman Gutierrez and Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parmer v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01412
Petitioner:
Robert B Parmer
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parmer v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Robert B Parmer
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Warren et al
as 6:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Daryl L. Davis
Defendant:
Don Warren, Shirley McKellar, Deborah Pullum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Backstrom v. McAfee
as 1:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Backstrom
Defendant:
Wiley B. McAfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyon v. Tovar
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Edward B Lyon, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, State Classification Committee TDCJ, Lynnette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin B. Smith, Christopher M. Wiedau, Bryan D. Reitsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
