Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Ballard v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Rashad Marquise Ballard
Defendant:
Ms. Jones, Chaplain Flynn, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Cox et al
as 1:2023cv00991
Petitioner:
Rashad Marquise Ballard
Respondent:
Warden Cox, Jones and Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ballard v. Cail et al
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
James Ballard
Defendant:
Jody Cail and Brian C. Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Penn
as 1:2022cv04251
Plaintiff:
Rashad Marquise Ballard
Defendant:
Mr. Penn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Woodard et al
as 4:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Rico Lamar Ballard
Defendant:
Sgt. Woodard, Deputy Warden Jones, Officer Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Parish et al
as 4:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Rico Lamar Ballard
Defendant:
Officer Parish, Officer Caldwell, Other Offcer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard vs. Sprayberry, et al.
as 4:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Rico Lamar Ballard
Defendant:
Warden Kelvin Sprayberry, Deputy Warden Jones, Deputy Warden Alise Hammock-Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Evan et al
as 1:2021cv00119
Plaintiff:
Christin Ballard
Defendant:
Joseph Evan, Geoffrey A. Alls and Melvin Kesner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLARD v. MORALES et al
as 5:2021cv00142
Plaintiff:
RICO LAMAR BALLARD
Defendant:
WARDEN JOSE MORALES and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLARD v. MORALES et al
as 5:2021cv00138
Defendant:
WARDEN JOSE MORALES, DEPUTY WARDEN TOMMY COFFEE, LT CLUBPER and others
Plaintiff:
RICO LAMAR BALLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
