Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv01911
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, A. Morell, Andrea Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Sherry Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, APD Officer A. Morell, APD Officer Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vickers v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Ta'Lawrence T. Vickers
Defendant:
C.O. Johnson, Lt. Cheatum, Medical Director Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAYTON v. GOODMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00418
Defendant:
SERGEANT FLOYD EDWARD, BRANDON GOODMAN, BARBARA CUMMING and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. EDWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00412
Defendant:
CO2 FLOYD EDWARD, EDWARD FLOYD, EDWARD and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. GOODMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
CO2 BRANDON GOODMAN, UNIT MANAGER BARBARA CUMMING, Warden WALTER BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milledge v. Ward et al
as 1:2021cv00052
Plaintiff:
Willie James Milledge
Defendant:
Barbara Colon, Timothy Ward, Ms. Champion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. EDWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00081
Defendant:
CO2 FLOYD EDWARD, CO2 ERIKA SHINHOLSTER, REGENIA WOMBLE and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vurgess v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2020cv00303
Defendant:
L. Holmes, Barbara Campbell and John T. Wilcher
Plaintiff:
Frank B. Vurgess, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannah v. Barbara et al
as 3:2020cv00094
Plaintiff:
Tobby Shawn Hannah
Defendant:
Nurse Barbara, Correct Health, Terry Langley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
