Cases 1 - 10 of 13
THORNTON et al v. BENEFIELD et al
as 5:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE BENITA THORNTON and RASHEKA LASHON CHANDLER
Defendant:
JUDGE DEBORAH C BENEFIELD, ERMAN TANJUATCO, ROBERT BENTHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coppage v. Benefield et al
as 3:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jarrod Coppage
Defendant:
C.E.O. Jade Benefield, Lucie K. Farmer, Ms Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THORNTON et al v. BENEFIELD et al
as 5:2019cv00306
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE BENITA THORNTON and RASHEKA LASHON CHANDLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, UNITED STATES, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOKES v. BENEFIELD et al
as 7:2019cv00034
Plaintiff:
PORTERFIELD STOKES
Defendant:
TONIE BENEFIELD, VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT, FBI GANG TASK FORCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Smith et al
as 1:2017cv03593
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Lecon Scott
Defendant:
Neil A. Smith, Kenyatta Smith, Keven Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Smith, et al.,
as 1:2017cv03182
Plaintiff:
Ricardo L. Scott
Defendant:
Neil A. Smith, Kenyatta Smith, Keven Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry et al v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv04255
Plaintiff:
Freeman Berry
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Deborah C. Benefield, Bonnie Kay Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. Superior Court Clayton County et al
as 1:2014cv03404
Petitioner:
Eli Malik-Jamil Bey
Respondent:
Superior Court Clayton County and Deborah C. Benefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Horton v. Degennaro et al
as 1:2013cv03869
Plaintiff:
Charles Horton
Defendant:
Nicholas Degennaro, Charles Sedberry, David Benefield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thornton v. Benefield et al
as 1:2013cv03206
Plaintiff:
Georgette Benita Thornton
Defendant:
Deborah C. Benefield, Benham and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
