Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bussie v. McDonnel et al
as 2:2015cv00089
Petitioner:
Anthony Bussie
Respondent:
Robert "Bob" McDonnel, Maureen McDonnel, State of Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shabazz v. Virginia General Assembly et al
as 3:2013cv00240
Plaintiff:
Hassan Raashann Shabazz
Defendant:
Virginia General Assembly, George Allen, Jim Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballance v. Clark et al
as 1:2013cv00239
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Ballance
Defendant:
Harold Clark, Ponton, C/O Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beaman v. Deputy Director et al
as 7:2012cv00163
Defendant:
Rita J. Angelone, Karen D. Brown, Elizabeth E. Carr and others
Plaintiff:
John H. Beaman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuhne v. Barry et al
as 1:2011cv01218
Plaintiff:
Jamie Kuhne
Defendant:
Stan G. Barry, Bob McDonnell, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Ami'n v. McDonnell et al
as 2:2010cv00381
Petitioner:
Rashi'd Qawi' Al-Ami'n
Respondent:
Bob McDonnell, Helen Fahey and Virginia Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parks v. SWVRJA Superintendent et al
as 7:2010cv00110
Respondent:
Attorney General Of The State Of Virginia, Bob McDonnell and SWVRJA Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tucker v. Arlington County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2009cv00420
Petitioner:
Reginald S. Tucker
Respondent:
Arlington County Circuit Court, Bob McDonnell and Commonwealth Of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lay v. McDonnell
as 1:2008cv01179
Petitioner:
John R. Lay
Respondent:
Bob McDonnell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lay v. McDonnell
as 7:2008cv00572
Petitioner:
John R. Lay
Respondent:
Bob McDonnell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
