Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Carr (PS) v. CoreCivic et al
as 1:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Heshimo Yaphet Carr
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Crowley County Correctional Facility, Executive Director of CDOC, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berman v. Brandt
as 1:2023cv00057
Petitioner:
Leland Jason Berman
Respondent:
RRM Phoenix and Matthew Brandt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Headlee v. Santini
as 1:2022cv03258
Plaintiff:
Brandt Headlee
Defendant:
G. Santini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newman v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv03125
Petitioner:
Jacob Newman
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Matthew Brandt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brezonick v. Brandt
as 1:2022cv02823
Petitioner:
Matthew Brezonick
Respondent:
Matthew Brandt
Interested Party:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Harvey v. Lisac et al
as 1:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel J. Harvey, III
Defendant:
Lisac, Thompson, Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandt v. Garcia et al
as 1:2021cv02140
Plaintiff:
Eric Brandt
Defendant:
Benjamin Garcia, Kenneth Chavez, Donna Starr-Gimeno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandt v. Firman et al
as 1:2018cv00915
Plaintiff:
Eric Brandt
Defendant:
Patrick Firman, Patrick (I) Firman, Newtown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandt v. Stovall et al
as 1:2017cv01634
Plaintiff:
Eric Brandt
Defendant:
Jeff Stovall, Jeff (I) Stovall, Cliff Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grayson v. Public Defender's Office et al
as 1:2017cv01363
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dennis Grayson
Defendant:
Public Defender's Office, Andrea Brandt, Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
