Cases 1 - 10 of 68
(HC) Lane v. Cates et al
as 2:2024cv01763
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lane
Respondent:
Brian Cates and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lane v. Cates et al
as 2:2024at00787
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lane
Respondent:
Brian Cates and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Crain v. State of California et al
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Gary Crain
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noe Moreno v. Brian Cates
as 2:2023cv08676
Petitioner:
Noe Moreno
Respondent:
Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Amesquita v. Macomber et al
as 1:2023cv01604
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Amesquita
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Brian Cates, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Horsley v. Cates
as 1:2023cv01248
Petitioner:
Allen Ray Horsley
Respondent:
Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horsley v. Cates
as 1:2023at00708
Petitioner:
Allen Ray Horsley
Defendant:
Acting Warden Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abraham v. Cates
as 5:2023cv03587
Petitioner:
Alec Scott Abraham
Respondent:
Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Gomez v. Cates
as 1:2023cv01001
Petitioner:
Ascencion Gomez
Respondent:
Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Simmons v. Cates, et al.
as 1:2023cv00856
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
Brian Cates and Katleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
