Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Bridges v. Ward et al
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Bridges
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Warden Walter Berry, Eric Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baskin v. Labott et al
as 1:2023cv03799
Plaintiff:
DeSean M. Baskin
Defendant:
Patrick Labott, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. White et al
as 3:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Legend Bridges
Defendant:
Jermaine White, Cpt. Fuller, Sgt. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIDGES v. SISKA et al
as 5:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
COREECE LENARD BRIDGES
Defendant:
DOCTOR CESAR SISKA and COMERCIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges et al v. White et al
as 3:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Legend Bridges and Keontay Miller
Defendant:
Warden Jermaine White, Captain Fuller, Sergent Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURKE v. CHASTEEN et al
as 5:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BURKE
Defendant:
JUDGE ROBERT W CHASTEEN, JR, ROSA CHILDS, PATSY BRIDGES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Coweta County Sherriffs Office
as 3:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lester L. Bridges, Sr
Defendant:
Coweta County Sherriffs Office and Linda Cash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Carroll County, Georgia et al
as 3:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Tahji A.D. Bridges
Defendant:
Carroll County, Georgia, Sheriff Terry Langley and Valerie Cooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Langley
as 3:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Tahji A.D. Bridges
Defendant:
Sheriff Terry Langley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridges v. Langley
as 3:2021cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tahji A.D. Bridges
Defendant:
Sheriff Terry Langley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
