Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Pope v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
LeTarea Pope
Defendant:
Lt. John Aimsworth, Officer Nate, Officer Bridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Xavier Bridges
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bridges v. Cain
as 2:2021cv00157
Plaintiff:
Melvin Louis Bridges
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bridges v. Cain
as 5:2021cv00096
Plaintiff:
Antonio Laron Bridges
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bridges v. Cain
as 4:2021cv00137
Petitioner:
Antonio Laron Bridges
Respondent:
Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bridges v. Bates
as 5:2021cv00086
Plaintiff:
Melvin Bridges
Defendant:
Honorable Dewitt T Bates, Jr.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bridges v. Bates
as 5:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Melvin Bridges
Defendant:
Judge Dewitt T. Bates, Jr.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Hicks et al
as 3:2020cv00501
Defendant:
Lt. Barnett, Officer Morre, McQueary Jordan and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Carvis Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bridges et al
as 3:2020cv00328
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Breedlode, Officer Unknown Chaplain and Sgt. Unknown Bridges
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Carvis Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Vaugh et al
as 3:2020cv00104
Defendant:
Sgt. Unknown Hicks, Winston, Johnthen Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Carvis Lamar Johnson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
