Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Cook v. Burke et al
as 4:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Marcus Cook
Defendant:
Mr. Burke and Mr. John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Sales
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
William Burke
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cochran v. Burks et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Cadet D. Burks, Deputy L. Cochran and Strike Officer Hollie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochran v. Burks et al
as 1:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Cadet D. Burks, Deputy L. Cochran, Strike Officer Hollie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. WEST et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Defendant:
Lieutenant ADRIAN WEST, Warden LETITIA BURKS, ANTHONY ANTONIO HAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burk v. Superior Court Catoosa Co
as 4:2023cv00294
Petitioner:
Arnold Cordell Burk
Respondent:
Superior Court Catoosa Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. WEST et al
as 4:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Defendant:
LT ADRIAN WEST, Deputy Warden LETITIA BURKS, ANTHONY ANTONIO HAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURKE v. SALES
as 5:2023cv00458
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BURKE
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burk v. Catoosa County Superior Court
as 4:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Arnold Cordell Burk
Defendant:
Catoosa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fambra v. Doe et al
as 4:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Fambra
Defendant:
John Doe and Dr. Richard Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
