Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Burks v. USA
as 4:2024cv00306
Petitioner:
Ameer Burks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BURK v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL A. BURK
Defendant:
DR LITTLE, PA NICHOLSON, MS FAVALORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURK v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv05042
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL A. BURK
Defendant:
MS. DAVIS, PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and D. VARNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURK et al v. WELLPATH et al
as 2:2023cv04233
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL ALI BURK, JR., MALIK MORAGNE, GEORGE PICKETT and others
Defendant:
WELLPATH, SCI CHESTER, PAUL LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURK v. QUINN et al
as 2:2023cv03004
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL A. BURK
Defendant:
MS. QUINN, AGENT MS. JAMES, SUPERVISOR MS. JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: ELIJAH BURKS
as 2:2023cv02889
Petitioner:
ELIJAH BURKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Burk v. McGarry et al
as 4:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Ishmael A. Burk
Defendant:
T. McGarry, Correctional Officer Ferrone, Correctional Officer Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURKE v. PA DOC et al
as 2:2023cv02598
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BURKE
Respondent:
PA DOC, THE HEARING EXAMINER OF SCI CHESTER and THE OFFICIALS OF SCI CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Talley v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, MHM, Inc., Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neff v. Walker et al
as 4:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Neff
Defendant:
Walker, Armel, Brittain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
