Cases 1 - 10 of 15
MITCHELL et al v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
MIKAL S. MITCHELL, KAL SHAREEF EL, SERGIO ROSADO and others
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY, DAVID KELSEY, ARAMARK CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARBER v. SGT. STASSER et al
as 2:2016cv04710
Plaintiff:
RONALD JAMES BARBER
Defendant:
SGT. STASSER, SGT. DANIELLE, MACIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARBER v. SHU OFFICIALS
as 2:2014cv03475
Plaintiff:
RONALD BARBER
Defendant:
SHU OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDS et al v. WONG, M.D. et al
as 3:2014cv03353
Plaintiff:
DORIS RICHARDS , LINDSAY BARBER and ESTATE OF JOAN BARBER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WONG, M.D., COUNTY OF MERCER , JOHN AND JANE DOES I, II, AND III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TEJERA v. LANIGAN et al
as 1:2013cv03872
Plaintiff:
NOWIN A. TEJERA
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, DR. YOSLOV and DR. BARBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARBER v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2013cv03118
Petitioner:
SHAWN BARBER
Respondent:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BARBER v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2013cv02817
Plaintiff:
RONALD BARBER
Defendant:
BRUCE DAVIS, M. HYATT, R. HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2012cv06379
Plaintiff:
THADDEUS THOMAS, RONALD BARBER, RAYMOND ALVES and others
Defendant:
STEVE JOHNSON, MERRIL MAIN, SHANTAY BRAME ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARBER v. JONES et al
as 2:2012cv02578
Plaintiff:
RONALD J. BARBER
Defendant:
J. JONES and 1-10 JOHN & JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARBER v. DOAG et al
as 2:2011cv03670
Plaintiff:
RONALD JAMES BARBER
Defendant:
JONATHAN DOAG, STEVEN JOHNSON, MERRIL MAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
